British Controlling Hand in Russiagate Exposed

British Controlling Hand in Russiagate Exposed

Feb. 9 -- Recent events in the ongoing "Russiagate" saga in the United States fully confirm what Lyndon and Helga Zepp LaRouche said when the anti-Trumpers first began peddling the "Russia meddled/Trump colluded" fairy tale about the 2016 presidential election: It is not Russia, they charged, but the British who attempted to rig the election, colluding with the Obama intelligence agency leaders and the Hillary Clinton campaign to defeat Donald Trump.  To end the coup danger, they added, the British must be exposed, and their operations in the United States must be permanently shut down.   With the release of memos in the last week, by Republican Representative Devin Nunes and Senators Grassley and Graham, focused on the pivotal role of "former" MI6 operative Christopher Steele in the attempted coup against President Donald Trump, there is no longer any doubt that the LaRouches were right.  

An article published February 7 on the Sic Semper Tyrannis blog of former intelligence officer Pat Lang echoes what the LaRouches have been saying since Trump's election.  The article, by a blogger under the name Publius Tacitus, is titled "Did British Intelligence Try to Destroy the Trump Presidency?"

Read More

Ex-MI6 Fraudster Christopher Steele a No-Show at London Libel Suit Deposition, as New "Grassley" Memo Exposes More of the British/U.S. Deep State Coup Against Trump

Ex-MI6 Fraudster Christopher Steele a No-Show at London Libel Suit Deposition, as New "Grassley" Memo Exposes More of the British/U.S. Deep State Coup Against Trump

On Tuesday the headline from Zerohedge said, "Steele Goes Dark; Ditches London Court Appearance Following Criminal Referral By US Senate". The 84-year-old Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA)'s released, now mostly unredacted memo demonstrating that the former British spy Christopher Steele not only lied to the FBI about his dossier media contacts on behalf of the Democrats' Fusion GPS hired guns, but also that the Bureau covered for Steele's lies while seeking FISA warrants may have had something to do with the no-show in London libel court. Certainly U.S.-based attorneys for Russian technology executive Aleksei Gubarev want to know why Steele was happy to discuss his dossier (which risked its allegedly super sensitive Kremlin sources) with gossipy reporters, but not under oath to defend the veracity of his sources and work in court.

Scribd file of this week's released Grassley memo

Despite the cowardly Steele's unwillingness to defend the truthfulness of the dossier, despite numerous allegations the document makes being proven false or hotly disputed in existing and pending libel suits (such as from Trump attorney Michael Cohen, whom the dossier falsely places in Prague meeting with Russian agents, echoing years later 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta's infamously made up meeting with Iraqi intelligence agents in the same city reported to drum up support for the American-led invasion of Iraq), there are still deep state spokesmen willing to defend Steele and the dossier's integrity on cable news and social media.

John Sipher, who runs a blog called the Cipher Brief and writes for Just Security and other sites while regularly appearing on CNN and MSNBC, has doubled down on his insistence that Rep. Devin Nunes and Grassley are hurting U.S. intelligence sharing, principally with the British and other 5Eyes (former British empire countries) partners, supposedly by smearing the poor innocent ex-spook Steele. In reality, Sipher, his former boss CIA director John Brennan and ex-James Comey FBI aide Josh Campbell and their recent hires as 'analysts' by MSNBC and CNN respectively, reveal not only deference, but humiliating sycophancy from supposedly loyal American 'ex' security agency executives to their masters in London. It is richly ironic that these same spooks who invoke 'democratic norms' and the Founding Fathers memory to denounce Trump as a Kremlin-blackmailed, Russia-colluding traitor would likely be regarded by the brave Founders who revolted against the Crown as British stooges, modern day Benedict Arnolds. -- JWS

Read More