The signs of change in #Iran and the regime’s overthrow have appeared. The prospects for the victory of Iran’s democratic revolution, devoid of the mullahs and the Shah are looming. - tweeted by Maryam Rajavi, June 30, 2018
Chess pieces are being moved. Chairs are being scrambled. Chaos has entered the Old World Order and the smart people are rushing now to get on the right side of history. A #TPX triumvirate (Trump-Putin-Xi) has joined forces and everybody knows who the enemy has been the whole time.
Those of you who regarded #Q as nothing more than a silly role-play game being foisted on the Internet Gullible have already missed the boat on the foreknowledge of North Korean events that #Q easily dished out this past Spring. Now #Q is indicating that the battle for the freedom of Iran has been engaged and that she will be victorious though the path will be ugly. To those of you whose livelihoods depend on an accurate trade, you might want to wake up with a dose of due diligence. Sitting on the wrong side of history can get expensive.
It is now a moot point as to whatever #QAnon is, or isn't. Personally I couldn't care less if #Q is a fire-breathing aardvark dressed in a green tutu. It no longer matters. What does matter is that the President and his Team #Q are effecting a massive worldwide paradigm shift. The Cause is irrelevant. The Effect is where you need to focus.
Rudy Giuliani and Newt Gingrich were in Paris today at the annual Free Iran rally which has been held for many years by members of the Iranian diaspora. The face of the Iranian resistance is the woman shown here, Mrs. Maryam Rajavi. Giuliani was clearly speaking on behalf of President Trump when he said in his speech today that "next year, we will have this convention in Tehran."
There may be some of you ostriches out there who insist on bickering about how outrageous it was for Trump to cancel the JCPOA or fret that the world is collapsing because sanctions will destabilize the Middle East even further. Meanwhile, as you're bicker, the revolution is rolling. If you have wisdom, as W. likes to say, you will get the heck out of its way.
Bribing the Mullahs
On the subject of the JCPOA, statements made by Mrs. Rajavi and Iranian resistance journalists this past week have made it clear that they are IN FAVOR of the Iranian sanctions. Why do you suppose people who love their homeland would want to see more economic pain inflicted on their own people? Because the pallets of cash that President Obama gave to Iran through the JCPOA were nothing but a big fat welfare check that landed smack in the lap of the Ayatollah. The Iranian people never saw a dime of it. The Iranian people have never benefited from the JCPOA dead deal nor would they ever.
But why did Mrs. Rajavi say that a new regime "devoid of both Shah and Mullah" was the destiny of Iran? What was so bad about the former regimes lead by two apparently opposed ideologies, the Shah and the Ayatollah?
Would it surprise you to learn that when the #DeepState was bribing the Shiite clergy with pallets of cash, they were really paying themselves?
Khomeini on the Payroll
I was a bit taken aback a few weeks ago when I posted my blog Making Persia Great Again and some readers objected to the statement that the CIA and British intel were responsible for the 1979 revolution and the transference of the Ayatollah from religious leadership to political governance. The Mullahs have been their puppets, bought and paid for. I thought everybody knew that. If you don't, you can click this link and read the quoted proofs of that statement.
Mrs. Rajavi's MEK and NCRI resistance fighters have known the sting of #DeepState largesse all too well. Years ago, after Hillary's crowd acceded to taking the MEK off America's list of terrorists, the activists within the Iranian resistance movements were offered a free trip to Camp Liberty in Iraq "for their own protection." Yeah right. Camp Liberty was a concentration camp. According to this blog posted in 2012 [linked here], "MEK leaders have been reluctant to complete the move from Camp Ashraf to Camp Hurriya, formerly an American facility known as Camp Liberty. They complained about conditions at the new camp, calling it more a prison than a home after the first convoy arrived in February."
Gee, thanks, Hillary.
Four years later, Secretary of State John Kerry lauded the resettlement of all members of “exiled Iranian opposition group, the Mujahedin e-Khalq, or MEK,” from Iraq to Europe in September 2016, emphasizing that “their departure concludes a significant American diplomatic initiative that has assured the safety of more than 3,000 MEK members whose lives have been under threat."
Do you see how the Clintonistas were just moving these resistance fighters further and further away from their homeland? Neither Obama nor Clinton was ever going to help democracy take root in Persia again, with or without a JCPOA.
In fact, if you read between the lines of Giuliani's statement made today, he has covertly admitted that the U.S. had a share in installing the medieval mullah regime back in 1979 when he said "This time, we are not replacing a government with a government that we do not know...."
Of course, the big elephant in the room is where does Russia's President Putin and China's President Xi stand in all of this? Some would say that Putin will never support an American-backed regime change. Let's qualify that statement. Putin will never stand for a CIA-backed regime change. That's what got the MidEast where it is today, obviously.
Putin and Xi have already signalled that they are are waiting to see if President Trump is committed to opposing the Old World Order by cleaning up his own house first. Two weeks ago, they rejected Iran's application for membership into the Shanghai Co-Op. This makes 12 years that Iran has been rejected. And yet we all know that Iran is a vital component for today's Silk Road dream. What are they waiting for?
If Putin is presented with a choice of a) an oppressive, unpopular, backward-thinking Shiite dictatorship bent on supporting Hezbollah and never ceasing hostilities with Israel ... or b) a forward-looking democracy ready to do business with its Asian neighbors, which do you think would be Putin's logical choice? He's an awfully smart man, or so I hear. He knows that when the CIA Mullahs are broken, the Iranian sanctions will be removed. Hello, Belt & Road.
Naturally, that choice has likely already been presented to Putin which is why the July 16th summit has been announced.
British Empire in Panic
#RussiaGate is winding down. Everybody is coming to the realization that the Babylonian British Empire has been the real enemy in that fiasco. Hillary has been awfully busy looking for friends from New Zealand to Ireland lately. An American-Russian rapprochement is the Old World's worst nightmare.
Donald John Trump is no slouch when it comes to history. Joseph P. Farrell has also commented on the upcoming Trump-Putin Summit and reminded his readers of this fact of American history: the British were always the enemy. The [non-Communist] Russians were always the friend. Dr. Farrell wrote this recently [linked here]:
From one point of view, Britain's alarm over the approaching summit is perfectly understandable, for it has long been a goal of British geopolitics to contain Russia, and to prevent "the two unthinkable nightmares", i.e., (1) a Russo-German understanding or alliance, and (2) a Russo-American understanding or alliance.
The latter possibility was starkly dramatized during the American War Between the States, when France and Britain were both considering an intervention on the side of the Confederacy. British officers, for example, were present with General Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia at the Battle of Gettysburg as observers. The failure of that campaign, plus the Russian Tsar Alexander II, who sent his fleet to Union ports, made the message clear; France and Britain backed off, and the American Civil War remained an American affair.
So, when Donald John Trump came up with his #MAGA rallying cry so many years ago, which America did he have in mind? The one that cowered before the Babylonian-Venetian mercantile interests as expressed from the City of London at the turn of the last century? Or the one where America was open for business with its neighbors to the west?
I have a feeling the answer will become evident after July 16th.