I could crack the planet with enough time and the right resonance. - Nikola Tesla (in a comment by Dr. Joseph P. Farrell, December 2016)
In the previous article in this #Celestials series, we took a look at the first of three interviews published by Daniel Liszt of DarkJournalist.com with Dr. Joseph P. Farrell regarding Farrell's observations on whatever is really going on at CERN, a science project that was legally created in 1954 to supposedly study particle physics in the quest for the Higgs Boson, the "god particle." In this blog, we will examine Dr. Farrell's opinions on why CERN poses a danger to mankind and even to our entire galaxy:
- No sovereign power has authority over CERN.
- There is evidence of a secret, elite agenda being pursued at CERN while the Public is deliberately misdirected.
- Symbols and language used by CERN representatives betray that the project is seeking to manipulate reality or even achieve the power of ultimate destruction and creation.
We say "supposedly" because in the second interview partially transcribed and lightly paraphrased below, Dr. Farrell gets us to think logically about what CERN's machine, the Large Hadron Collider (or, LHC), is itself suggesting to us. Couple that suggestion with the fact that CERN, a science organization, was set up legally to function as its own sovereign state with no other government having any judicial oversight over its actions, and you have the making of a cosmological monster.
Liszt and Farrell immediately dive in to the prospect that the LHC machine may in fact be an extension of that one project that the Nazi scientists classified as above top secret, The Bell, the "wunder" of all "wunderwaffes" (German for wonder, or miracle, weapons). To bring you up to speed on what exactly has been postulated about the German "Bell" project (Die Glocke), here is a quick 3-minute video summary. Note how physical effects were observed that caused changes in the molecular structure of plants and animals that were unhappily located near The Bell. Many scientists working on the project even died from exposure to it:
No Court Can Touch CERN
In the interview below, Dr. Farrell noted that when the LHC was first turned on September 19, 2008, the project administrators suffered an "unforeseen electrical event" between two of the accelerator’s magnets and the equipment had to be shut down immediately. The official press release from CERN did comment on the event a month later [linked here]. This was the official, "move along, nothing to see here" statement:
Investigations at CERN1 following a large helium leak into sector 3-4 of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) tunnel have confirmed that cause of the incident was a faulty electrical connection between two of the accelerator’s magnets. This resulted in mechanical damage and release of helium from the magnet cold mass into the tunnel.
“This incident was unforeseen,” said CERN Director General Robert Aymar, “but I am now confident that we can make the necessary repairs, ensure that a similar incident can not happen in the future and move forward to achieving our research objectives.”
Dr. Farrell reminds us that when individuals have attempted to bring lawsuits against CERN, those lawsuits have been summarily dismissed simply because the litigants "had no standing" and the courts "had no jurisdiction" over CERN.
Near the 15mm marker of the video linked below, Dr. Farrell makes this comment about the lack of judical oversight:
So what does that tell you? It tells you that CERN is a sovereign entity. You cannot bring a lawsuit against it because it is sovereign and because it has so many countries involved. It is the physics equivalent - the cosmological equivalent - of the Bank For International Settlements.
That right there should give people pause. Why would you need that sovereign status if this project is about "open science"? The sovereign status should tell you that there is a secretiveness to this whole project. It is not all about what they are telling us. The "particle physics" thing is for public consumption. You've got a planetary-sized torsion machine. That, I think, is the real project here.
Dr. Farrell then postulates that CERN is deceiving the world. On the one hand, it has presented a very carefully crafted narrative for public consumption of a harmless physics research project. However, the true story is that CERN is likely pursuing a secret project in a very different area of science and is developing a "wonder weapon." He goes on to say:
Let's not forget that one of the movers and shakers who helped set up CERN was this Nazi lawyer named Walter Hallstein. He was an advisor to Konrad Adenauer who helped write the charter that set up CERN. So you have this Nazi influence behind it. CERN is about much more than particle physics. It is a secret project.
Nothing to Do with Particle Physics
Dr. Farrell continues the interview by taking us through a thought experiment. What is it about the quest for evidence of hyperdimensions that is so attractive to the CERN scientists?
The really interesting thing to me is why ARE we looking for higher dimensions? Why are we thinking that this machine COULD show evidence of that? Well I hate to put it so bluntly, but, Richard Hoagland has a marvelous saying: "When you think of hyperdimensional physics, there are three rules: Rotation, Rotation, Rotation." And what, after all, is the Large Hadron Collider? It's a huge system of interlocking rotation! That indicates to me that it ... is ... a ... huge ... torsion ... machine. [emphasis mine] It is a magnetically rotating machine that is going to cause local planetary effects. So, in other words, if you stop and think about it, what they're doing is a very clever bit of misdirection.
You've got this enormous machine that clearly has hyperdimensional implications. But what are they saying? "Look at how small are the particles that we're spinning." In other words, they are directing you to the PARTICLE physics when in fact the machine itself says "You should really be looking at PLANETARY effects and possible STELLAR effects." But they don't want YOU looking there because if you start looking there, you're going to be finding interesting correlations like the ones some people are finding.
They want you looking at particle physics and the blizzard of equations and be all confused about all this arcane stuff when, in reality, they're doing something else. What I'm suggesting to you, by that clever use of spin, pardon the pun, is that they're really talking about PUBLIC CONSUMPTION PHYSICS (the particle physics) and PRIVATE HIDDEN PHYSICS that has nothing to do with particles. It's got everything to do with rotating magnetic fields, planetary effects, and resonance effects. In a certain way, you can even look at that machine as a huge antenna, a huge broadcasting apparatus.
The Dark Journalist host and Dr. Farrell then reminded us that a statue of Shiva sits at the entrance to the CERN complex. Shiva is a somewhat androgynous Hindu god that can transform or transition matter from a state of creation to destruction and back again to creation.
Assume the Shiva Position
The conversation continues at the 31-minute mark between Liszt and Farrell with a reminder that the scientists at CERN revere the symbology of Shiva and have very likely resurrected the uncompleted Wardenclyffe project of Nikola Tesla.
JPF: Shiva is the Hindu god of Creation and Destruction. In Hindu mythology, Shiva can only create something new by first destroying something old. This is a very unusual statue to have as your corporate logo for a collider that's supposed to be doing nothing but particle physics. Shiva is all about creating and destroying WHOLE WORLDS not just little tiny particles. Again, they are telling you in their own symbolism that this is about more than just particle physics.
They are telling you that they are playing around with the alchemy of the entire universe. They are playing around with a technology that will give them the insight, possibly, in how to manipulate that reality. And that, again, is a godlike power. So, their religious language, in a certain sense, is condigned to what they're actually up to, even in a particle physics sense.
Now here's the other problem. CERN is embedded underground, embedded in rock. Let's go back to Nikola Tesla and his Wardenclyffe tower and to the statements he made to the New York Circuit Court when a lawsuit was brought against him for non-payment of monies that had been loaned to him for this project. The lawyers asked him about the big iron poles that were sunk deep into the ground. Why were those poles necessary?
Nikola Tesla did not hide the true capability of his astonishing, though unfunded and unfinished, research. He talked openly about it in a local court of law. When he died, American Deep State factions sent none other than John Trump, uncle to President Donald John Trump, to examine Tesla's private papers for evidence of weapons research.
Cracking the Planet
Farrell continues at the 33-minute marker with the recent history of Nikola Tesla's attempt to bring free energy to the world:
Tesla responded, "In order for the machine to work, it has to get a grip on the earth." Why? Because Tesla was inverting the normal electrical circuit of broadcast power. In other words, if you look at a broadcast circuit, the antenna is broadcasting out into the air, basically, it's sending electricity out into the air, and that circuit is closed through the ground [you know, like "grounding wires"]. The Earth is what closes the normal electrical circuit for your light bulbs, your computers, etc. Tesla simply flipped the whole system upside down and was using the Earth as the broadcast antenna and the return circuit was through the air.
So now let's look at CERN. What do you have? You've got a huge system with magnetic fields far in excess of the local magnetic fields of the earth embedded in the rock of the earth, literally "getting a grip on it." So I'm looking at the possibility that, when you're looking at CERN, you're looking at a huge Tesla machine that is literally designed to create effects in the earth.
Let's remember what else Tesla said, "I could crack the planet with enough time and the right resonance." Well there's your Shiva. This is what the Nazis wanted more than anything else. And which country is the biggest contributor to CERN? It's not the U.S. or U.K. It's GERMANY. And what is Angela Merkel's Phd in? She has a PhD in quantum chemistry.
Daniel Liszt then asks Farrell: Is this something that can get out of control?
Sword of Damocles
JPF: That is a Pandora's box of a question. They will tell you that computer algorithms are filtering the data, that there is a peer-review system. [my note: But things have gone wrong at CERN before, even from the very beginning.]
I believe there is a hidden data correlation experiment that is being conducted, and not just with CERN, but with other networks. Everytime the system is turned on, is there a measurable effect on human behavior? In the stock market? In the magnetosphere? In Earth's internal dynamo? How about in the Sun itself? Because when you're manipulating magnetic fields - remember, the fields at CERN are several times stronger than earth's own natural magnetic field - this gives them access to technologies that could conceivably manipulate human behavior.
The implications of CERN are enmormous any way you slice it.
DJ: Who is driving all of this? Who make up this "cosmology cartel"?
JPF: My point in using that phrase is to highlight that this is why CERN has its own sovereign status. They want to control the information about particle physics and cosmological physics. They've set themselves up like a Science Vatican, giving their "imprimatur" [sanction] to this or that theory. The public is the orthodoxy who believes that this is all just about particle physics. But when you look at the machine itself, it's about something entirely different. Those are the heresies that they don't want you to know about. It's a cartel of cosmology. That, to me, is a dangerous sign that the scientific effort itself is being shortchanged by CERN. How can anybody else duplicate their results and apply the scientific review process if it's all kept secret?
And guess what, after CERN started making all these grand announcements that nobody else is allowed to review and replicate, what did the Chinese announce? "We want to build one too. We want a bigger one." That tells me right there that China is suspicious of the results that CERN is presenting to the public. They want to see for themselves.
The cosmology cartel is under assault. They have attempted to suppress any competing idea or institution.
DJ: That's going to set up quite the battle royale for supremacy in publicly suppressed weapons.
JPF: And the Chinese aren't interested in competing with the particle physics side of CERN. Chinese scientists are already working at CERN! They must be interested in the weapons angle of CERN. And then Russia came along and said, yes, we want our own collider too.
Here is where the second interview comes to an end. In conclusion, the above interview with Dr. Farrell has left us with these astonishing postulations and the unspoken horror of a supra-sovereign entity that is deliberately ignoring the dangling sword that it has placed over our lives:
1. CERN is funded mainly by the nation of Germany and yet sits outside the purview of any other political or judicial entity.
2. CERN tells the public that it is researching particle physics and hunting for this or that quantum particle. However, privately, she is pursuing secret research into the human and planetary effects that can be derived from rotating massive magnetic fields.
3. CERN scientists and researchers have allowed themselves to become enchanted with the possibility of attaining Shiva-like capabilities, dabbling in the "alchemy of the universe" to bestow upon themselves the power of both creation and destruction.
The third interview will continue with the theme of cosmogenesis, modern day archaeology wars, and the race to revive ancient knowledge and ancient technologies.